Monday, February 26, 2007

02/25/07 NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses

NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses


(for week ending 02/25/07)








By Guichard Cadet






Rank Previous Week Teams Total Strength Most Minutes Played Most Shots Attempted
1 2 Phoenix 61.32 Marion Marion
2 1 Dallas 60.19 Nowitzki Nowitzki
3 6 Detroit 58.04 Prince Hamilton
4 7 Chicago 57.39 Deng Gordon
5 5 San Antonio 56.61 Duncan Duncan
6 4 Utah 56.45 Williams Williams
7 3 Cleveland 56.40 James James
8 8 Houston 55.89 Battier McGrady
9 10 Washington 55.85 Arenas Arenas
10 9 New Orleans 55.67 Mason Mason
11 11 Toronto 55.18 Parker Bosh
12 12 L.A. Lakers 54.81 Bryant Bryant
13 14 New Jersey 54.48 Carter Carter
14 13 Golden State 54.14 Ellis Davis
15 17 Orlando 53.58 Howard Howard
16 16 Indiana 53.47 Granger O'Neal
17 20 Sacramento 52.99 Bibby Bibby
18 15 L.A. Clippers 52.98 Brand Brand
19 24 Charlotte 52.89 Okafor Morrison
20 19 Minnesota 52.76 Garnett Garnett
21 21 Atlanta 52.59 Johnson Johnson
22 22 New York 52.58 Crawford Crawford
23 18 Denver 52.08 Camby Anthony
24 23 Portland 52.03 Randolph Randolph
25 25 Miami 50.92 Wade Wade
26 26 Milwaukee 50.82 Bell Williams
27 27 Seattle 49.93 Allen Allen
28 28 Philadelphia 49.59 Iguodala Iguodala
29 29 Memphis 48.98 Miller Miller
30 30 Boston 45.17 Gomes Jefferson

Monday, February 19, 2007

02/18/07 NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses


NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses

(for week ending 02/18/07)

at the All-Star Break




By Guichard Cadet



Rank Previous Week Teams Total Strength
1 2 Dallas 57.55
2 1 Phoenix 56.52
3 7 Cleveland 53.81
4 6 Utah 53.44
5 3 San Antonio 53.02
6 12 Detroit 52.99
7 5 Chicago 52.87
8 9 Houston 52.72
9 17 New Orleans 52.55
10 4 Washington 52.05
11 16 Toronto 52.02
12 8 L.A. Lakers 51.83
13 11 Golden State 51.49
14 15 New Jersey 51.36
15 10 L.A. Clippers 50.94
16 13 Indiana 50.92
17 14 Orlando 50.86
18 19 Denver 49.87
19 20 Minnesota 49.51
20 24 Sacramento 49.23
21 28 Atlanta 49.16
22 18 New York 48.81
23 21 Portland 48.75
24 23 Charlotte 48.60
25 27 Miami 48.14
26 22 Milwaukee 47.66
27 26 Seattle 47.25
28 25 Philadelphia 47.17
29 29 Memphis 46.59
30 30 Boston 42.44

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Knicks At The Break - 2007

Structured Offense vs. Run & Gun

by Guichard Cadet

Isiah Thomas is a better coach than he thinks. During Summer League play, the talk was of his running the “Quick” – basically a hybrid offense to push tempo and hide the team’s lack of shooting deft.

A 6 win, 11 losses start to the season quickly shifted that focus. Initially the losing seemed to be a function of a tough schedule filled with back-to-backs and playing 13 games against teams that made the playoffs the previous season.

It also highlighted a dilemma. The Knicks did not have the offensive firepower to fully go up-tempo, nor the offensive efficiency & defensive mindset to play a slow down game. The third game of the season proved this. In this loss against Indiana, the Pacers shot at will on the perimeter, and shut down the Knicks offense.

Even though the team established a pattern of early first quarter double-digit deficits, the strength of schedule continued to be the excuse, until the Knicks got blown out by the Minnesota Timberwolves, and lost back-to-back to the Chicago Bulls.

Thomas realized he essentially had two teams on his hands – one excelled in a half-court structured offense; the other in an up-tempo run & gun frenzy.

S.O. Players - Marbury, Curry, Frye and Richardson. Though Richardson found some success with the Phoenix Suns, he excels shooting setshot 3-pointers in halfcourt sets and not the break.

R & G Players – Crawford, Francis, Robinson and Balkman. The Knicks fate lies in Crawford’s ability to function in the structured offense. His defense needs improvement, his points come mostly on isolation plays, and his assists primarily to Curry, with little inkling to utilize Frye and Richardson’s offensive talent.

David Lee - Though more suited for an up-tempo game, he has shown the ability to function playing either style while lacking a consistent jump shot. He makes up for it with great shot selection, rebounding and increased accuracy at the free-throw line.

Jared Jeffries – This was a questionable signing because the team already had Lee and Balkman on the roster. Running a structured offense accentuates his offensive woes.

Though Thomas kept the shell of the Quick offense, he abandoned the principles, choosing to focus on establishing Curry as a dominant low-post threat.

This move has paid off to a certain degree because the Knicks have gone 17-19, for an overall record of 23 wins, 30 losses. Curry has improved offensively, but the team continues to struggle defensively against teams that push tempo while having the ability to shoot from the 3-point range.

Thomas needs to take one more step into his basketball roots, and forego some offense by letting defensive-minded players (Jeffries and Balkman) make their offensive mishaps because they hide Curry and Frye’s defensive limitations, much like Chuck Daly did with John Salley and Dennis Rodman.

With the owner’s mandate to show “significant improvement”, Thomas has equated validating the Curry trade as the crux of his argument that last season was due to Larry Brown’s coaching shenanigans and not his General Manger / Talent Acquisition strategy.

Now that the team has matched the previous season’s win total (23), Thomas should now expand his coaching repertoire, perhaps even borrowing a page from Hubie Brown’s coaching philosophy, in which he uses two distinct units, each having different directives.

Shortening the rotation makes no sense because the team has few “two-way” players, and there is too much money tied up in contracts for non-starters (Francis, Jeffries, Rose and James).

Monday, February 05, 2007

02/04/07 NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses


NBA Rankings based on Strength of Wins / Losses

(for week ending 02/04/07)





By Guichard Cadet



Rank Previous Week Teams Total Strength
1 1 Phoenix 52.32
2 2 Dallas 51.46
3 6 Utah 48.56
4 5 Chicago 48.40
5 4 Washington 48.31
6 7 Cleveland 47.91
7 3 San Antonio 47.73
8 8 L.A. Lakers 47.48
9 12 Detroit 47.34
10 9 Houston 46.54
11 10 L.A. Clippers 46.52
12 13 Indiana 46.50
13 14 Orlando 46.41
14 16 Toronto 46.15
15 11 Golden State 46.02
16 15 New Jersey 45.95
17 17 New Orleans 45.19
18 18 New York 44.85
19 23 Charlotte 44.79
20 21 Portland 44.34
21 19 Denver 44.26
22 22 Milwaukee 43.85
23 20 Minnesota 43.72
24 24 Sacramento 43.67
25 28 Atlanta 43.26
26 27 Miami 42.75
27 25 Philadelphia 42.73
28 26 Seattle 42.02
29 29 Memphis 41.53
30 30 Boston 38.53